How to Predict Your Marathon Time
During a recent track workout, which had me running several 800's at about three minutes each, the coach of the group I run with told me it was similar to a popular marathon prediction workout called Yasso 800's. I did a little research on this, as well as several other marathon prediction methods, to try to figure out what type of pace to shoot for on race day. Here are the best I've found.
Yasso 800's. Here's the idea. Pick a marathon time you'd like to run. Replace hours by minutes and minutes by seconds to get your 800 meter pace. Sounds complicated, but it's not! Since I need to run the marathon in 3 hours, 10 minutes to qualify for Boston, my 800 pace becomes 3 minutes, 10 seconds. If you can do 10 of these 800's, slowly jogging for that same amount of time between each (3:10 for me), then this method predicts you can run your marathon at the corresponding hours-and-minutes time! The coach told me that a lot of people think this method is too optimistic, so adding five minutes to your marathon time is a good rule of thumb. Here's a link to Runner's World's take on Yasso's.
Galloway's Magic Mile. Former Olympian and current coach Jeff Galloway (the walk-run guy) has his own method for predicting race times, and not just marathons. And the great thing about his method is that it's simple, albeit painful. Run one mile as fast as you can, middle-school style (don't barf or die, though). Then to predict your marathon time, take your mile time (in seconds) and multiply by 1.3. The result is your marathon pace per mile, in seconds. I haven't done this one yet, but just to give an example: In my last 5K, I ran the first mile in 5:53. Let's say that if I were going all-out, I could have run a single mile in 5:40 (you're supposed to actually do it, of course, not guess). That's 340 seconds, and 340 x 1.3 = 442 seconds, or 7:22 marathon pace, for a 3:13 marathon.
Galloway actually gives you a break; he says to run four one-mile time trials, drop your lowest, and average the remaining three to get your mile time. He also gives different adjustment factors to predict 5K, 10K, and half marathon times at his website.
Jack Daniels' Tables. There are myriad jokes one could make here; I'm going to take the high road and keep quiet. Jack Daniels is a famous running coach (I can't help it—he's a good coach alright, when he's not making Tennessee whiskey!), and author of a book I really like, Daniels' Running Formula. In the book, he gives a table for predicting any common race time, given any other common race time, based on what seems like a lot of research and statistics. You can find such a pace table here (Table 1). Basically, you look up a recent race time, and from that you look to the left or right to find your projected time for another distance. Don't worry about the "VDOT" column, it's something from the book. Ideally, you want the race distances to be similar (i.e. use a half marathon time to predict a marathon time, if you have a recent one). You also want things like the terrain and conditions to be similar. Example: My half marathon a few months ago was extremely hilly, so I can't really compare that one. But if I look up my recent 5K time of 19:15 on a very flat course, the equivalent marathon time is about 3:04. If you're not into tables, running coach Greg McMillan has a similar tool here, called McMillan's Running Calculator.
Anyone ever try one of these? How did it work for you?
Related posts:





![[veganomicon cover]](http://www.nomeatathlete.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/veg-247x300.jpg)



wow a 3:07! get it!!
i am always tinkering with the online calculators. i did yasso 800s last fall/winter in prep for the '09 goofy challenge. i was running them 3:20 or better. i am not sure how effective they are as a measurement though because i was doing the half and the full. i went all out saturday in the half and just tried to survive the full (successfully). i ran a 1:34 half though, i wonder if that can be 'linked' to my sub-3:20 800s somehow?
lindsay´s last blog ..we got ourselves a game
Congrats on the Goofy Challenge. Crazy if you ask me, though! My wife and I did the Disney full this year, maybe we saw you!
A very rough estimate is to double the half and add 5 minutes. So by that, your 1:34 half is "equivalent" to a 3:13 full. So sub 3:20 Yasso's makes sense, I guess!
Okay… so with a marathon coming up soon, I can see why you'd want to keep at it for consistent training… but you don't want to overdo it and hurt yourself! Maybe taking a couple of rest days would actually be beneficial to your training?
Sagan´s last blog ..Product Review: Glee Gum
Hey Sagan, thanks for being concerned
If this were a legitimate injury, I'd definitely consider more rest. But it's just a blister, so as long as it's not causing me to change my form, I don't think there's risk of getting hurt, like there would be running with an injury. Unless the blister never heals!
I haven't done Yasso 800s before, but I have "reverse-engineered" all of the other methods. In that, when I heard about them, I went through my training logs, looked for results in races or workouts for the various distances, plugged them in to the formulas, got my marathon time, and then compared against the actual marathons.
They are usually relatively close.
Blaine Moore´s last blog ..Emily’s Run 5k (2009)
That's good to know. I'm a little doubtful about the Yasso 800's. For example, yesterday's workout (part of my program to run a 3:10 marathon) was supposed to be 6 of them at 2:52, with only minute and a half rests. I would think that if you could complete this workout, you could do much better than 10 800's at 3:10 with 3:10 rests. So that would mean either the program or Yasso got something wrong.
Based on my 5K time of 19:41, Daniels predicted a half-marathon of 1:30:22, and I ran 1:30:19. That demonstrated to me that Daniels is onto something and that I was well trained to run the longer distance. That latter is key to these things being meaningfull, of course. (If I put all my time and energy into running a 18:41 5K, and succeeded, I doubt I would then find myself shaving 20 minutes off my marathon PR and hitting the Daniels-predicted 2:58:52. Heck, I probably wouldn't make four hours…)
Pete´s last blog ..Getting to Where I Want to Go
Plugging my 15K and 5K time into the Daniels tables I would hit my 3:40 that I am looking for. Do I think it is going to happen, I am not sure. In the past I have used the McMillan calculator, but I have read that it is more based on higher 70+ miles, in order to make it more accurate. For my shorter races, I seem to be fairly consistent for the times it predicts. I just need to get my endurance up there in order for my marathon to be consistent with the other race times.
My husband and I also did the Disney Marathon this past year. Our second year in a row.
And I got my shirt today…I will be wearing it on my run tomorrow and will take a picture and post it after.
Robin´s last blog ..Posts are so much more fun with pictures
Robin, I'm confused about the "70+ miles" thing. How is the calculator based on that? People who run 70+ per week?
I can't wait to see your shirt picture!
I used Galloway's Magic Mile method for training and to predict my half-marathon pace. A very effective way of setting your pace.
kara´s last blog ..Where Do You Pin Your Bib?